Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!ece-csc!mcnc!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!allosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu!bob
From: bob@allosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Let's not argue about semantics
Message-ID: <25771@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 26 Oct 88 18:02:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: tut.25771
References: <5807@zodiac.UUCP> <17784@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> <16961@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <7099@ut-emx.UUCP> <7590@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <7221@
Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept of Computer & Information Science
Lines: 16

In article <150@internal.Apple.COM> casseres@Apple.COM (David Casseres) writes:
>If 400 dpi is great, why does NeXT provide a 300 dpi "draft" mode?
>What advantage does it give?

Perhaps the decreased memory and CPU requirements for the in-cube
imaging engine make enough of a different that it's worth it
sometimes?  If application performance is more critical than printer
resolution, it would be a good time to switch to 300dpi "draft" mode,
like most ordinary mortal commodity PostScript laser printers.

>I wish I could get my hands on that system to wring it out...

Me too!
-=-
Zippy sez,								--Bob
Let me do my TRIBUTE to FISHNET STOCKINGS...