Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pacbell!belltec!jim From: jim@belltec.UUCP (Mr. Jim's Own Logon) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: NeXT Memory - No Error Checking or Parity ! Summary: RAM expert replies... Message-ID: <296@belltec.UUCP> Date: 31 Oct 88 15:56:10 GMT Article-I.D.: belltec.296 References: <549@gt-eedsp.UUCP> <1988Oct28.210152.29417@utzoo.uucp> Organization: Bell Technologies, Fremont, CA Lines: 42 In article <1988Oct28.210152.29417@utzoo.uucp>, henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes: > In article <549@gt-eedsp.UUCP> jensen@gt-eedsp.UUCP (P. Allen Jensen) writes: > >The reason was that "memory is reliable enough that the added cost > >was not justified." If you have ever worked on some older equipment > >without parity, your opinion may differ. Could an expert on RAM > >chips respond ? Is memory really "reliable enough" ? > > I'm not really an expert on RAM chips, but I do know that the reliability > of modern RAMs is *spectacularly* better than the ones that were routinely > in use 5-10 years ago. According to the last court case I was a witness at, I'm an expert in memory system design. Credentials upon request. While it is true that the reliability of RAMs being corrupted from spurious alpha partical hits has greatly increased this has actually left them more susceptable to other failures (which were more prevelant anyway). The size of the memory cell, and the rate of leakage were what made earlier RAMs easy to have bit errors due to random alpha particals. The newer (larger) RAMs have smaller cells and less leakage, making them more reliable. But, the main cause of memory corruption has always been noise. Electrical noise from exrternal sources (generators, power surges, etc.), and from internal sources (other chips, peripherals, power supply). The less the memory cell charge, the more susceptable to noise. It is also very true that some vendors products are much more resilient to signal noise than others (no, I won't name names). In this era of RAM shortage you can bet that a company will be scatter buying their RAM to get as much as possible and as cheaply as possible. It follows then that some of the NExT machines will be better than others, some will never fail, some will fall out in burn-in, and those in the middle.... What should they have done? Make it a build option. If you want the extra safety, you shell out the extra bucks. If you like going to Las Vegas, playing the lottery, and Russian Roulette, you can have the base unit. -Jim Wall Bell Technologies, Inc. The above opions are mine. However in this case, the company would probably go along with them.