Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c++:1874 comp.sys.next:505
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!tekecs!nobody
From: nobody@tekecs.TEK.COM (-for inetd server command)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Objective-C vs C++
Message-ID: <10554@tekecs.TEK.COM>
Date: 2 Nov 88 16:40:54 GMT
References: <8335@nlm-mcs.arpa> <3438@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV>
Reply-To: paulsc@radio_flyer.UUCP (Paul Scherf)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Wilsonville, OR
Lines: 10

>In article <3438@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> david@beowulf.JPL.NASA.GOV (David Smyth) writes:

>>I am not convinced that Objective-C is a good way to go: lack of strong
>>typing for example.  However, it is certainly a MUCH smaller addition
>>to C than C++.

I received some recent information on Objective-C.
Objective-C now appears to allow strong typing.

Paul Scherf, Tektronix, Box 1000, MS 61-028, Wilsonville, OR, USA
paulsc@orca.GWD.Tek.COM			tektronix!orca!paulsc