Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!peregrine!elroy!spl1!laidbak!att!pacbell!ames!mailrus!bbn!jr@bbn.com
From: jr@bbn.com (John Robinson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Using the NeXT and Ethernet for real-time voice
Message-ID: <8614@spl1.UUCP>
Date: 3 Nov 88 07:34:20 GMT
References: <10865@reed.UUCP>
Sender: news@spl1.UUCP
Reply-To: jr@bbn.com (John Robinson)
Organization: BBN Systems and Technologies Corporation, Cambridge MA
Lines: 12
In-reply-to: mdr@reed.UUCP (Mike Rutenberg)

In article <10865@reed.UUCP>, mdr@reed (Mike Rutenberg) writes:
>They [Xerox PARC] claim to get pretty good performance, even with
>a decent offered load.  I suspect the NeXT box might even be an
>improvement as it:
>	uses 10MBit/s Ethernet
>	the DSP could do more compression on the data
The DSP ought to be capable of toll-quality voice compression to 16
kbit/sec, so the 10 mbps will do lots of phone calls.  Even standard
phone stuff at 64 kbps isn't that much of a drain on the ether.
--
/jr
jr@bbn.com or bbn!jr