Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!uport!ken
From: ken@uport.UUCP (Ken Chapin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: does gcc work with -lc_s?
Keywords: Microport3.0e greenhills shared_libc
Message-ID: <254@uport.UUCP>
Date: 3 Nov 88 16:19:57 GMT
References: <30@calcite.UUCP>
Reply-To: ken@uport.UUCP (Ken Chapin)
Organization: Microport Systems, Scotts Valley, CA
Lines: 13

In article <30@calcite.UUCP> vjs@calcite.UUCP (Vernon Schryver) writes:
!>	gcc {,-g,-ga} {-OLM,} foo.c -lcurses -lc_s -o foo
!>produces a bad program.  After some trivial ioctl(TCSETA)'s, it calls
!>initscr(3X), which seems to call an internal routine (or something
!>sdb can't name), and then suffers a "Segmentation Violation".  Compiling
!>without '-lc_s' or with 'cc' instead of 'gcc' produces something which
!>works fine.  (Of course, the code is quite portable and passes lint.)
!>
!>Does the gcc in Microport 3.0e understand shared libraries?


We think that Gcc doesn't know about shared libraries and are working on 
it with Green Hills.