Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!vsi!friedl
From: friedl@vsi.COM (Stephen J. Friedl)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Bigger process IDs and "dev_t"s (was: Re: RISC v. CISC...)
Summary: Termcap revisited
Message-ID: <930@vsi.COM>
Date: 5 Nov 88 02:07:44 GMT
References: <156@gloom.UUCP> <6865@winchester.mips.COM> <468@oracle.UUCP> <1023@murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au>
Organization: V-Systems, Inc. -- Santa Ana, CA
Lines: 26


In article <1988Oct31.183021.13880@utzoo.uucp>, henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
> Clearly making dev_t 32 bits would make life easier,

In article <1023@murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au>, kre@cs.mu.oz.au (Robert Elz) writes:
> yes, what's more maybe we could do away with major *numbers* completely
> and use major *names* instead.  16 bits would be enough space for a
> 2 character name (which the whole universe, almost, could just treat
> as a number).  (Yes, I know that 2 chars isn't great, but it does fit).
> 
> Imagine ...
> 
> 	brw-------  1 root       sd,   0 Oct 18 12:34 /dev/sd0a

I can see it now: /etc/devcap will describe what these things mean.

Then, someday, when two characters is simply not enough, we'll
have to bite the bullet and go to /etc/devinfo, complete with the
`dic' devinfo compiler.

     Steve :-)

-- 
Steve Friedl    V-Systems, Inc.  +1 714 545 6442    3B2-kind-of-guy
friedl@vsi.com     {backbones}!vsi.com!friedl    attmail!vsi!friedl
--------Nancy Reagan on Dukakis for Pres: "Just say hohoho"--------