Path: utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!milano!bigtex!james
From: james@bigtex.cactus.org (James Van Artsdalen)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
Subject: Re: GCC 1.30 complaints
Message-ID: <9910@bigtex.cactus.org>
Date: 27 Oct 88 04:04:52 GMT
References: <8810220131.AA00312@ucsci.ucsc.edu> <1531@vaxnix.tandy.COM> <9773@bigtex.cactus.org> <1608@vaxnix.tandy.COM> <10343@eddie.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: james@bigtex.cactus.org (James Van Artsdalen)
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Institute of Applied Cosmology, Austin TX
Lines: 14

In <10343@eddie.MIT.EDU>, jbs@fenchurch.MIT.EDU (Jeff Siegal) wrote:

> In article <1608@vaxnix.tandy.COM> ron@vaxnix.UUCP (Ron Light) writes:
> >In article <9773@bigtex.cactus.org> james@bigtex.cactus.org (James Van Artsdalen) writes:
> >If I have a delay loop, for whatever reason, I would be very
> >angry if the compiler decided, for itself, "Oh, this is stupid, we don't
> >need this."

*PLEASE* be more careful with attributions.  I did not write the text
above.  I do write device driver code professionally, and I do *not*
want anyone (especially my boss) to think I might have produced such a
comment.
-- 
James R. Van Artsdalen      james@bigtex.cactus.org      "Live Free or Die"
Home: 512-346-2444 Work: 338-8789       9505 Arboretum Blvd Austin TX 78759