Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!unisoft!mtxinu!sybase!chaos!cuccia From: cuccia@chaos.UUCP (Nick Cuccia) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Getting Even Message-ID: <1872@sybase.sybase.com> Date: 8 Nov 88 01:20:49 GMT References: <367@execu.UUCP> <265@acheron.UUCP> <1636@pikes.Colorado.EDU> Sender: news@sybase.sybase.com Reply-To: cuccia@chaos.UUCP (Nick Cuccia) Organization: Sybase, Inc. Lines: 31 In article <1636@pikes.Colorado.EDU> netnews@pikes.Colorado.EDU (Usenet News) writes: > Furthermore, If this individual wanted to cause great damage to other machines > it would have been done. The fact that he created an experiment that was > non distructive and even cleaned up after itself shows true realization of > the potential for distruction. Depends on what you want to call "non-destructive." If you're talking about the loss of files or corruption of data, then yeah, the worm was non- destructive. But if you consider the amount of time that thousands of people had to spend to deal with the worm (or, for non-Internet sites, the threat of the worm), add that to the amount of system downtime (interrupting ongoing experiments or calculations) in many computer centers, and then add that to the loss of connectivity that the worm has caused, and you start to accumulate serious bucks, not to mention inconvenience. And, in any case, the virus could've caused some serious damage, especially if it infected a machine doing sensitive real-time work; Stoll (in _Stalking the Wily Hacker_) remarked that at one point the hacker that was being tracked stumbled onto a machine doing real-time medical monitoring; care to imagine the same machine being infected by many copies of the "benign" virus that was seen this past week? I sure don't. > Robert M. Sklar - News Administrator @ CU-Denver --Nick =============================================================================== Nick Cuccia System Admin/Postmaster, Sybase sybase!cuccia@sun.com {mtxinu,sun,pyramid,pacbell}!sybase!cuccia Me? Speak for my company? You're kidding, right?