Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!lsuc!ecicrl!clewis From: clewis@ecicrl.UUCP (Chris Lewis) Newsgroups: news.software.b Subject: Re: bugfix for inews (control messages cause coredump) Keywords: inews control coredump Message-ID: <131@ecicrl.UUCP> Date: 5 Nov 88 16:40:52 GMT References: <5686@fluke.COM> Reply-To: clewis@ecicrl.UUCP (Chris Lewis) Organization: Elegant Communications Inc. (CRL Division) Lines: 63 In article <5686@fluke.COM> battan@tc.fluke.COM (Jim Battan) writes: >Recently, I've noticed core dumps being left by inews. Other symptom - .ina and .ar(?) files left around. I used to get this on a spectrix machine (68020 with location zero readable - usually - a bug caused really large programs like Oracle to not be able to get at zero - not sure whether inews qualifies). Now I'm on a 3b1 (3.5.1.4) and haven't seen this occur yet (haven't been subscribed to comp.mail.maps long enough for a map supercede to actually delete something). >Index: control.c > (void) unlink(nfilename); >! if (q == NULL) >! break; >! else >! p = q+1; > } > #endif /* !NFSCLIENT */ Interestingly enough, when I went to install this patch, I found: (void) unlink(nfilename); if (!q) break; else p = q + 1; Hmm. Looks the same to me. Mod date Feb 15, 1988. I'm now running on a 3b1 (3.5.1.4) and haven't seen the bug crop up yet (and I'm not even sure at the moment whether this news software is the same as what was running on the Spectrix). Evidently, someone posted this bug fix back in February (it might have been me, but I don't think so - I only remember posting a bug fix for headers having tab separators after the colon - as C-news will sometimes generate) Every once in a while someone uncovers another bug in B-news and sometimes we get a flurry of unofficial patches some of which work, and some don't. It appears that Rick Adams isn't going to be posting any more official patches because of the nearness of C news or News 3.0. I think it's fair to say that many people would like to keep running B-news 2.11 until official release of C news or News 3.0 (this may already have been done - I've been off the net for a while) occur and perhaps beyond then. And, that new functionality isn't appropriate. And, that many people miss (or vaguely mistrust) patches that don't come from Rick Adams. Rick, it would be a great service if you could - give us at least a description (if not patch input) for any bug fixes that you've seen going by that *would* have gone into a patch 15 if you were to send one? Eg: a "maintenance-only" patch. - sanction in some fashion any new bugfixes going by? Thanks, -- Chris Lewis Ferret Mailing list:{uunet!attcan,yunexus,utzoo}!lsuc!gate!eci386!ferret-request {uunet!attcan,uunet,utgpu,yunexus,utzoo}!lsuc!ecicrl!clewis (or lsuc!gate!eci386!clewis or lsuc!clewis)