Xref: utzoo comp.unix.wizards:12244 news.sysadmin:1257 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!hubcap!gatech!uflorida!novavax!bigbroth!rk From: rk@bigbroth.UUCP (rohan kelley) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards,news.sysadmin Subject: Re: The Internet Virus--A Commentary Summary: Ethics class required for CS degree Keywords: ethics networks communication computer viruses Message-ID: <236@bigbroth.UUCP> Date: 9 Nov 88 13:17:51 GMT References: <1460@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu> Organization: UNIleX Systems, Inc., Fort Lauderdale, FL Lines: 32 In article <1460@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu>, rodgers@cca.ucsf.edu (Rick Rodgers) writes: > > Quite aside from the guilt or innocence of Mr. Morris, the picture painted by the NYT raises serious ethical issues; > The culprit, then, is a bright and technically oriented young person who is socially reticent, and who perpetrated this act out of boredom, having convinced himself that he intended no great mischief. > 3) If the culprit "quickly recognized that things had gone wrong," why did he not IMMEDIATELY call local management authorities and inform them of the problem, rather than delegating this to a friend, who then allegedly posted instructions in an obscure place? The first act represents a failure to take resonsibility for one's own actions, and the second a severe lapse in > judgment. > > It was here that the culprit may leave his most damaging (and lasting) mark. Communication requires openness, and open systems will always be vulnerable in some respect; their integrity will always rely ultimately upon the decency and good judgment of the participants. > What rick rogers has done is make a strong case for requiring a course in ethics for every CS major. It may not work, but a little more ethics in all our professions wouldn't hurt. We put some pretty powerful stuff in the hands of some pretty young (and sometimes immature) individuals in the CS courses across the country. Perhaps we should also tell them something of the ethics required for the "open systems" to do what it was intended! rk