Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!sgi!daisy!wooding
From: wooding@daisy.UUCP (Mike Wooding)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: Spencer's signature
Summary: offensive signatures
Message-ID: <1888@daisy.UUCP>
Date: 31 Oct 88 19:28:43 GMT
References: <1988Oct28.180827.25578@utzoo.uucp> <2074@kalliope.rice.edu> <17375@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
Organization: Daisy Systems, Mt. View, CA
Lines: 22

Charles Guest writes:
< In article <2074@kalliope.rice.edu> phil@Rice.edu (William LeFebvre) writes:
< >>The dream *IS* alive...    |    Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
< >>but not at NASA.           |uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu

< >..... I just wanted to
< >say, for the record, that I still take offense at Henry's signature.
< >Perhaps he thinks it's funny or perhaps he thinks it's true.  To me it is
< >neither.

< I also find Mr. Spencer's .signature offensive......HOWEVER Mr. Spencer
< writes some very good articles and has answered some poster's questions
< quite competantly.  I wish that he would lay off on his nasty NASA comm-
< ents, but I would rather have to muddle through his .signature than
< loose his input into this group.

 Just to dispel the notion of any unanimous consensus, I neither take
 offense, nor necessarily even agree with Mr.Spencer's signature. I
 greatly value his inputs, and take the signature to be an indication
 of his feelings. Don't take it too seriously: NASA isn't a religion.

 m wooding