Xref: utzoo sci.astro:2970 sci.space:7956 sci.space.shuttle:1825 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!mtwain.dec.com!klaes From: klaes@mtwain.dec.com (CUP/ML, MLO5-2/G1 8A, 223-3283) Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.space,sci.space.shuttle Subject: Stopping Space and Light Pollution. Message-ID: <8811011709.AA02398@decwrl.dec.com> Date: 1 Nov 88 20:05:00 GMT Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 119 For over thirty years now the human race has been launching all types of vehicles into the Universe, creating an immense "cloud" of human-made objects orbiting Earth and slowly expanding into the Solar System and interstellar space. While many of the satellites in space are of benefit to our society, many more are now inactive, floating around Earth serving no purpose at present. In addition to dead satellites and rocket boosters, there are also thousands of pieces of metal scrap and paint flecks from rockets and satellites which have disintergrated in orbit for one reason or another; and the satellite cloud is growing all the time. At present there is a one in thirty chance that a Space Shuttle could be struck by some man-made orbital debris; by 2010 the chances will be reduced to one in four. This cloud represents a danger on many levels: In space, this debris is orbiting Earth at eighteen thousand miles per hour (the minimum velocity needed to achieve and stay in orbit); while some of it will eventually be dragged into Earth's atmosphere and burn up, many more are in orbits which will last for millennia! As more functioning manned and unmanned vehicles are launched into orbit, the risk of being struck and killed/destroyed by this debris - no matter how small - grows constantly. Even a grain-sized particle could hit with the impact of a rifle bullet! And people and places on Earth's surface are not immune from the dangers of falling debris: If an object is large enough, it will not burn up completely and strike the surface. The Soviet nuclear-powered COSMOS satellite hitting Canada in 1978 and the United States SKYLAB space station hitting Australia in 1979 are good examples of debris too big to be burned up on reentry and the consequences which result. Satellite debris also interferes with astronomical observations. The incredibly sensitive instruments professional astronomers use can be "thrown off" by passing satellites and man-made debris. Even more threatening, just recently the French were stopped from launching a huge balloon ring satellite to commemorate Paris' Eiffel Tower's one hundredth anniversary. Many astronomers opposed the ring satellite, as it would have been the size and visual brightness of the full Moon as viewed from the ground and interfered with observations. They were also concerned that it might start companies advertising in space with huge satellite "billboards", which some *are* considering! Along with light pollution on the ground from ever-growing cities, astronomers - and those who just enjoy looking at the stars - are having their work cut out for them. The International Dark-Sky Association is an organization designed to help deal with our growing light pollution problem, while not compromising public safety in the process. For more details, write to: Dr. Dave Crawford Kitt Peak National Observatory PO Box 26732 Tucson, AZ 85726 You can also receive a brochure on an important meeting of astronomers and other scientists who discussed the problems of light pollution in Washington, DC, on August 13-16, 1988, by writing to Dr. Tomas Gergely, National Science Foundation, Dept. of Astronomy, 1800 G St., NW, Washington, DC 20550. Now I know some of you are probably asking yourselves: "How can I possibly stop and/or clean up space debris? I'm afraid I don't have much access to a Space Shuttle with a huge vacuum cleaner; also, I and other average citizens did not personally make the pollution now flying over our heads!" I am well aware of this, and naturally this is a project for a major government and/or corporation to handle; but as is always pointed out, such organizations won't do much of anything unless it personally affects them and/or the citizens they are supposed to serve say something about it - in other words, write to your Congressman; it does a lot more good than you might think. Tell them there should be a major program to start picking up the useless satellite and rocket debris orbiting Earth. It can be done using the Space Shuttle, or even relatively cheaply using robot satellites which can attain orbits where the Shuttle cannot; and what is even better is that the debris need not be returned to pollute Earth. For one thing, some old, deactivated satellites are now part of space history, and deserve to be returned to Earth for placement in our museums. Others still have valuable parts which can be reused and/or recycled; and as for the truly useless debris, if it is small enough it can be deorbited to burn up completely on reentry, or launched into the Sun with no harmful effects to our star. The debris can also be placed in safe containers and launched into solar orbit away from Earth, or even out of the Solar System, but I do not care for this plan, as it does not destroy the debris, and just leaves the hazard for future space travelers when humanity start to colonize this and other star systems. I would like to point out that I am aware these clean-up plans are not for the immediate future, as I understand the difficulties in orbital mechanics, such as trying to send an object towards the Sun, etc., but I hope they will inspire the start of such projects when it is more feasible. I am also aware of the recent Air Force project designed to deorbit booster rockets earlier than normal for previous missions, to make Low Earth Orbit (LEO) a bit less cluttered; I personally approve of this, but it might be more beneficial if we could recover the boosters and other debris for scrap metal, if nothing else. I just feel that *something* should be started relatively soon, so that it does not become too late for us to do anything about it by the time we are socially and technologically ready. It would be horrible to think that we might trap ourselves on this planet with our own space debris circling the globe, making space launchings too risky to attempt. This is an extreme view in some ways, but not impossible. Besides the fact that man-made debris is potentially dangerous to satellites and humans, why else should we "clean up" space? Because it will help the future of our space programs, which in turn benefits all of society. These very clean-up projects will get us more involved in space exploration and colonization. We will colonize the other planets and star systems someday, and we cannot continue to bring our pollution and poor management habits with us. Space leaves very little room for error and bad planning. What you say to those who will guide our future in space can have a lot of impact. Do not think of space as something separate from Earth and its concerns: We live on a planet in space, and if we ruin not only our world but the environment around it, then where can we go to live? Larry Klaes