Xref: utzoo can.general:1013 sci.bio:1602 sci.med:7789 sci.misc:2818 Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!sq!lsuc!ncrcan!ontenv!soley From: soley@ontenv.UUCP (Norman S. Soley) Newsgroups: can.general,sci.bio,sci.med,sci.misc Subject: Re: Dioxin and Native Communities Message-ID: <276@ontenv.UUCP> Date: 15 Nov 88 05:17:03 GMT Article-I.D.: ontenv.276 References: <544@yunccn.UUCP> <591@apss.apss.ab.ca> Organization: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto Lines: 44 In article <591@apss.apss.ab.ca>, nmm@apss.ab.ca (Neil McCulloch) writes: > In article <544@yunccn.UUCP>, john@yunccn.UUCP (John Hummel) writes: > > 1)"Tests have revealed 210 parts per trillion of 2,3,7,8-TCDD, the most > > > > 1 to 9 parts per trillion." (MOE Press Release July 17,1986) > > > > ces.No 2,3,7,8-TCDD was found at a detection level of 20 parts per quadrillion > > Would someone with experience of testing for trace chemicals care to > comment on these levels? 20 parts per quadrillion! Now that's 20 parts in > 1,000,000,000,000,000. I find it hard to believe that reliable measurements > can be made at this level from samples taken in the field. I am not speaking from the position of authority you seek, and although I work for the organization which published (and holds the copyrights on ;->) the documents from which the figures were drawn I for darn sure don't speak for them now. Misinterpretation of scientific reports is common on the part of the media, for instance contrary to what the newspaper tells them some people who test positive for HIV antibodies are refusing to actally contract AIDS. The problem being that one of the original reports on AIDS contained some statistics which were grossly misinterpreted by the press to mean that HIV exposure leads irreversably to AIDS then death. The quoted figures are all drawn from press releases written by, yes you got it, former reporters. If one were to go back to the original scientific reports a clearer picture might emerge. In this case I gather that what was being reported on are the results of a "exists/does not exist" test which is believed to have a threshold in the order of the figure quoted. Considering some of the things that medical science is able to detect in a complex fluid like human blood it shouldn't be too hard to spot traces of something as complex as 2,3,7,8-TCDD in a simple fluid like water (as cluttered as a field smaple might be it's got nothing on what we cart around in our bloodstream) also considering just how dangerous that little guy is (makes PCB's look like drinking water) I certianly hope the detection threshold is very low. -- Norman Soley - Data Communications Analyst - Ontario Ministry of the Environment UUCP: uunet!attcan!lsuc!ncrcan!ontenv!soley VOICE: +1 416 323 2623 OR: soley@ontenv.UUCP " Stay smart, go cool, be happy, it's the only way to get what you want"