Newsgroups: can.general Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!csri.toronto.edu!clarke From: clarke@csri.toronto.edu (Jim Clarke) Subject: Re: Free Trade: Why is there no 'Plan B'? Message-ID: <8811182233.AA03813@esplanade.csri.toronto.edu> Organization: University of Toronto, CSRI References: <410@telly.UUCP> <1826@pembina.UUCP> <6761@watcgl.waterloo.edu> <8811142039.AA19223@harbord.csri.toronto.edu> <6848@watcgl.waterloo.edu> Distribution: can Date: Fri, 18 Nov 88 17:33:34 EST In article <6848@watcgl.waterloo.edu> lrbartram@watcgl.waterloo.edu (lyn bartram) writes: > [quoting from me:] >>What inquiring minds want to know is, why is this stuff in can.general instead >>Toronto Star or the Calgary Herald; if it's to be on this network too, let it >>at least appear in the designated snakepit. Or at least, if it's to appear >>in can.general, let the article not contain errors that *I* can correct. > >It strikes me, Jim, that *you* are the first person to indulge in biased >flame throwing .... Hmm. I thought I'd effectively hidden what I think about the free trade agreement. I have an opinion, but I do *not* plan to discuss it here. I read the Toronto Star; it strikes me as heavily anti-free trade. I see occasional excerpts from the Calgary Herald (in the Star!), which leave me with the impression that it is equally heavily pro-free trade. My point is that I do not think any of us have a right to put our political opinions in this news group. In can.politics, yes, but not in can.general. But I shouldn't have bothered to say so. Complaints about what goes where seldom reduce the overall flow of inappropriate material -- I certainly didn't! -- and besides, I obviously left the impression that I was trying to say something about the agreement itself, which I certainly wasn't. -- Jim Clarke -- Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Toronto, Canada M5S 1A4 (416) 978-4058 BITNET,CSNET: clarke@csri.toronto.edu CDNNET: clarke@csri.toronto.cdn UUCP: {allegra,cornell,decvax,linus,utzoo}!utcsri!clarke