Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!gatech!psuvax1!schwartz@shire.cs.psu.edu From: schwartz@shire.cs.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Why is the RT slow? Summary: sun3 < RT < sun4 Message-ID: <4130@psuvax1.cs.psu.edu> Date: 19 Nov 88 05:46:25 GMT References: <5046@polya.Stanford.EDU> <691@quintus.UUCP> <1620@basser.oz> Sender: news@psuvax1.cs.psu.edu Reply-To: schwartz@shire.cs.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz) Organization: Pennsylvania State University, Computer Science Lines: 7 In-reply-to: andrewt@basser.oz (Andrew Taylor) In article <1620@basser.oz>, andrewt@basser (Andrew Taylor) writes: >More RT models came out this year. I know nothing about them. For the most part, they are faster than a Sun3/160 but slower than a Sun4/260. Drystones available upon request. -- Scott Schwartz