Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!ucbvax!husc6!bunny!xg00
From: xg00@bunny.UUCP (Xev Gittler)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Elm 2.1 still not received in comp.sources.unix
Message-ID: <6286@bunny.UUCP>
Date: 22 Nov 88 15:57:54 GMT
Organization: GTE Laboratories, Waltham, MA
Lines: 10

Considering the length of time that it is taking for 2.1 to be placed
in comp.sources.unix, would it really be so bad for the person in
charge to post 2.1 (or .2, .3, .4, or whatever it's up to) to this
group? I think that would make a lot of sense.


-- 
					Xev Gittler
					xg00@gte.com, or
					xg00%gte.com@relay.cs.net