Xref: utzoo comp.mail.uucp:2357 comp.mail.misc:1402 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ateng!chip From: chip@ateng.ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: Another example why not to re-route Message-ID: <1988Nov26.195926.19030@ateng.ateng.com> Date: 27 Nov 88 00:59:26 GMT References: <140@minya.UUCP> Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL Lines: 14 According to lear@NET.BIO.NET (Eliot Lear): >I don't understand why [John Chambers] didn't contact the site >administrator doing the rerouting and tell him that [his] link was down. Step back and take a deep breath, Eliot; and think again. If the site in question hadn't been an active rerouter, there would have been no need to contact anyone. And no problem. Active routing loses. Why is this so *hard* for some people to understand?! -- Chip Salzenberg or A T Engineering Me? Speak for my company? Surely you jest! Beware of programmers carrying screwdrivers.