Xref: utzoo news.sysadmin:1427 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:5316
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pacbell!rtech!gonzo!daveb
From: daveb@gonzo.UUCP (Dave Brower)
Newsgroups: news.sysadmin,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: SF columnist on the Worm, suggests new terminology.
Message-ID: <457@gonzo.UUCP>
Date: 12 Nov 88 17:42:04 GMT
Reply-To: daveb@gonzo.UUCP (Dave Brower)
Organization: Gonzo Media Group
Lines: 164

Jon Carrol's Wednesday column in the SF Chronicle is an interesting
example of the level of "popular journalism".  It gyrates wildly between
keen insight and gross misinterpretation, arriving at something near a
balanced perspective.

It does suggests a metaphor for these events, in the spirit of the
tcp-ip swamp:  The worm "frogged" the Internet.  We could refer to 
painfully visible spelunking as "frogging".

-dB

----------------

                    "Random Thoughts About the Worm"

As faithful followers of the media and the hypermedia are already aware,
a computer "worm" infected numerous extremely large computer systems
around the country last week.  The worm's name was ":sed
'1,l$/d':/bin/sh," or "sh" to its friends.  It did no real damage, but
it did eat up an enormous amount of column inches and TV air time.

In conversations with people who know more about computers and worms
that I do (approximately half the known world), the following facts
and/or plausible opinions have emerged.

1.  The difference between a worm and a virus is similar to the
difference between a common cold and brain cancer.  A worm does not eat
up or change existing cells; it just fills up empty information cavities
with disgusting gunk.

2.  Interestingly, there is no direct cybernetic evidence that Robert
Morse Jr. is the worm-master.  Computer technology being what it is, the
"telltale files" could have been planted by anyone, including Barry
Manilow.  I make no accusations here; I merely note the possibility.

3.  What allowed the worm to enter the systsems was a programming
structure called a "trapdoor," which is a device built into a computer
system that allows the very smartest people to move more quickly through
the system than the ordinary user.  Such holes exists in virtually every
system, including the ones that allow you to withdraw $100 on Saturday
and the ones that launch large pizzas at Leningrad.

4.  WHATEVER ITS CAUSES, the Worm Event was essentially a benign
occurance.  Given the sophistication of the worm program, it is easily
possible that the worm master could have introduced a curious anomaly
into, say FedWire, which is responsible for transferring $500 billion
(think: half-a-trill) around the planet each and every day.

5.  It is an interesting question, not yet decided, whether members of
the affected networks (like the University of California) could sue UNIX
(from whom they bought the program with the trapdoor that let the worm
begin to burrow) for lost revenues.  Although there is no case law on
the matter, there is also no reason why not.

6.  It is necessary to make a distinction beween "hackers" (who are
simply people who understand computers very well and are unwilling to
accept authoritarian definitions of what they should do with their
knowledge) and "crackers," who invade extant computer system with malign
intent.  It seems probable that the worm-master was a hacker. To blame
him (or, possibly her) for the trapdoor is like blaming Cassandra for
the fall of Troy.

7.  THE MOST IMPORTANT thing to understand is that computer programming
is an extremeley intense art form.  It is also a scientific discipline,
but its addictive fascination lies in its creative component.  Creating
a truly innovative program is (for the artist) exactly like painting the
roof of the Sistine Chapel.

Therefore, the hole that the worm went through may bee seen (in
aesthetic terms) as a big blank piece between the figure of Adam and the
figure of God on said ceiling.  The hacker/artist saw the hole and said,
"I'll bet the original artist meant for the two hands to be touching
there.  How stupid of him to have forgotten to put that in."

So the angry artist, upset at the unlovely disunity, decides to draw a
big frog between God and Adam.  "This," he says to himself, "will
probably call attention to the problem."

- Jon Carrol