Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!apple!bionet!agate!ucbvax!SOL.ENGIN.UMICH.EDU!bhoward From: bhoward@SOL.ENGIN.UMICH.EDU Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: rtm and uucp Message-ID: <8811250157.AA17649@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 22 Nov 88 01:11:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 45 From louie.udel.edu!law Mon Nov 21 18:22:58 1988 From: law@louie.udel.edu Sender: tcp-ip-request@sri-nic.arpa To: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa Date: 13 Nov 88 19:24:53 GMT Organization: University of Delaware Message-Id: <5356@louie.udel.EDU> References: <8409@alice.UUCP>, <8597@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US> Subject: Re: rtm and uucp In article <8597@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US> jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (John F. Haugh II) writes: >It would be so nice if someone would undertake a security audit to >insure that work other college students did, which *is* currently >in production, doesn't contain any surprizes. >Our friendly enchilada may not be the only prankster out there ... I sincerely hope you are not making a general statement about college students. I take great pride in the fact that UDel allows some students to work at the system level, even in system administration, I happen to be one of those students and have taken slight offense to the recent messages that seem to knock college students as being like RTM. Not all of us write worms and think about how to break security in our spare time. -- Jeffrey A Law University of Delaware PHONE: (302)-451-8005, (302)-451-6339 ARPA: law@udel.EDU, UUCP: ...!!udel.edu!law the computer aided engineering network (caen) at the university of michigan depends on a core of 23 fulltime professionals and a roughly equal number of "student" professionals to maintain our network of 500+ apollos, 50+ suns, 350 macs and maciis and assorted ibm machines. the distinction is mostly an artificial one, emphasizing a difference in pay, rather than responsibility or skill. these students are help maintain basic systems services, software development and (perhaps not surprisingly) systems security. they are routinely given the root password and determine with the rest of the systems group who else also requires its use. there has never been any question of their integrity. the suggestion that college students are any more unreliable as a group than, for example, professional systems staff, is unfounded. people respond as they are treated; if treated as responsible members of the computing community, in general, they will respond in kind. if constantly placed in an adversarial role, they become your nemesis. bruce howard