Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!super!udel!rochester!cornell!mailrus!cwjcc!hal!nic.MR.NET!tank!sphinx.uchicago.edu!arxt From: arxt@sphinx.uchicago.edu (patrick palmer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: rad: versus vd0: Keywords: rad:,vd0: Message-ID: <894@tank.uchicago.edu> Date: 22 Nov 88 22:31:00 GMT Sender: news@tank.uchicago.edu Reply-To: arxt@sphinx.uchicago.edu (patrick palmer) Distribution: na Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations Lines: 28 I installed 1.3 and autobooting last weekend. It was very easy, thanks to Go Amigo and GVP. I have a question about rad: I used to use vd0:. In spite of space being alloted to vd0:, Workbench always indicated the total amount free, counting only what was actually used in vd0: , not what was assigned in mountlist. (I was always curious about what would happen if I filled ram: so that less space was left than was assigned to vd0:, but it never happened so I never found out.) With 1.3, the space assigned to rad: is deducted from the available free ram (in the workbench top line - I really should learn the names of these things). If vd0: really was so flexible as to allow more ram: to be used when vd0: was not full, I would prefer to use vd0: - I think. My questions: 1. Was vd0: as flexible as it appeared to be to the naive user? 2. Is there a good reason to use rad: instead anyway? (I do not need it for autobooting.) 3. When I tried to install vd0: under 1.3, I screwed everything up so badly that a warm reboot would not recover. I had just copied the relevant part of mountlist from 1.2, copied vdisk.device to the devs directory, and mounted vd0: in my startup sequence as I had under 1.2. Is there something else that needs to be changed to install vd0: under 1.3? Or did I just screw up? Pat Palmer email: arxt@sphinx.uchicago.edu (bitnet or arpanet)