Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!RICHTER.MIT.EDU!krowitz From: krowitz@RICHTER.MIT.EDU (David Krowitz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: Re: Hey Apollo folks...Listen up Message-ID: <8811161430.AA09625@richter.mit.edu> Date: 16 Nov 88 14:30:16 GMT Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 51 Whoa, pardner ... I've been speaking to some of the people at Chelmsford, and although no one has been able to give a clear picture of everything that has been going on, I have been able to glean a little information. 1) First of all, GPR is still bundled with Domain/OS and will remain there for the fore-see-able future. The DM requires it, as does X-windows, DSPST, and others. 2) I am told that Domain/OS includes a right-to-execute license for the 2-D GMR runtime library, but that you have to buy the manuals and media (on the order of $100) because not everyone uses it and wants to pay for it. I'm still trying to find out what other graphics products have run-time licenses bundled with the OS. Our current nodes came with 2-D GMR bundled with the hardware, so I suspect that current customers all own 2-D GMR development licenses in addition to the runtime licenses. I'm waiting for a reply on this one, though. We *will* have to start paying maintenance on 2-D GMR seperate from the OS, *and* we will have to start paying maintenance for the OS seperate from the hardware. We will no longer have to pay for TCP/IP, as that has been bundled with the OS. I am waiting for a revised series of contracts to get to me (sometime next week) so I can total up the changes and see what the new overall cost will be. I expect it to be higher. 3) Back around SR9.2 - SR9.5, 3-D GMR was bundled with the OS, which in turn was bundled with the hardware. We bought at least one or two machines in this period, and we got a copy of manuals and media for the SR9.5 version. We have not paid maintenance on the product, as no one was using it. I'm trying to find out whether this means that we still own a runtime and/or development license for this product and can simply order another set of manuals and media. Apollo has been extremely (VERY EXTREMELY!) out of line in not providing current customers, their field service offices, and even the sales force with the information about how they are restructuring their licenses. We have received no (absolutely none) letters, flyers, or even phone calls about this matter until the flaming began on this mailing list. Now that it has, I've received a couple of calls from people I know in Chelmsford who are trying their best to get out the correct information. The people who started this whole mess, however, should be getting their Xmas bonuses from Sun shortly. -- David Krowitz krowitz@richter.mit.edu (18.83.0.109) krowitz%richter@eddie.mit.edu krowitz%richter@athena.mit.edu krowitz%richter.mit.edu@mitvma.bitnet (in order of decreasing preference)