Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!proxftl!markd From: markd@proxftl.UUCP (Mark Davidson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Seagate ST-225 Message-ID: <1037@proxftl.UUCP> Date: 18 Nov 88 15:25:32 GMT References: <1717@questar.QUESTAR.MN.ORG> <4617@bsu-cs.UUCP> <90@usl-pc.usl.edu> <616@ablnc.ATT.COM> <1198@fredonia.UUCP> Reply-To: markd@proxftl.UUCP (Mark Davidson) Organization: Proximity Technology, Ft. Lauderdale Lines: 16 Summary: Expires: Sender: Followup-To: Distribution: Keywords: In article <1198@fredonia.UUCP> grig8348@fredonia.UUCP (LoyEllen Griggs) writes: > >Maybe I'm the odd man out, but I've had _two_ ST225's running one on top of >the other in an XT compatible for two and a half years now with nary a >sign of a problem. [some text deleted...] > Have people really had massive problems with ST225's? With all this talk about ST225's, I thought I'd mention that I've had an ST-225 in my PC for 3 years and haven't had a single problem with it. Now, the Western Digital controller it is attached to is a different story... No, I don't take the machine on trips; no, it doesn't run 24 hours a day; No, I've never dropped it; I guess I'm just lucky. -- In real life: Mark E. Davidson uflorida!novavax!proxftl!markd Proximity Technology Inc., 3511 NE 22nd Ave, Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33308 #define STANDARD_DISCLAIMER