Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:21390 comp.sys.mac:23026
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!serene!rfarris
From: rfarris@serene.UUCP (Rick Farris)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Scientific Word Processor Sought
Summary: Compared to what?
Message-ID: <18@serene.UUCP>
Date: 19 Nov 88 01:51:23 GMT
References: <42951@yale-celray.yale.UUCP> <767@auvax.UUCP> <1842@pembina.UUCP>
Reply-To: rfarris@serene.cts.com (Rick Farris)
Organization: Serenity Systems
Lines: 20

In article <1842@pembina.UUCP> simon@alberta.UUCP (Simon Tortike) writes:
~In article <767@auvax.UUCP> kevinc@auvax.UUCP (Kevin "auric" Crocker) writes:
~>
~>Lotus Manuscript is the BEST Scientific and Mathematical word processor
~>on the market and it includes all the regular word processor features.
~
~I beg to differ, but I have yet to see mathematical typesetting done
~better than TeX except by a human professional.
~-------------------
~Simon Tortike, Department of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineering,

So in what areas do you find Manuscript deficient?  Have you ever used it?
Or are you just beating your own drum?  Also note that the original requester
asked for a _word processor_.  Tex, in any of it's forms, is in *no* way a 
word processor.

-- 
Rick Farris          |  rfarris@serene.cts.com  | voice     619 259-6793
POB M                |       -* KCBIW *-        | pub.access    259-7757
Del Mar, CA  92014   | ...!uunet!serene!rfarris | serene.UUCP   259-3704