Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!hubcap!gatech!rutgers!mailrus!ames!killer!pollux!ti-csl!m2!holland
From: holland@m2.csc.ti.com (Fred Hollander)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Programmer's Extender
Message-ID: <64103@ti-csl.CSNET>
Date: 21 Nov 88 16:32:36 GMT
References: <8617@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <17361@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU>
Sender: news@ti-csl.CSNET
Reply-To: holland@m2.UUCP (Fred Hollander)
Organization: TI Computer Science Center, Dallas
Lines: 26

In article <17361@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU> u2dj@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (Ron Beloin) writes:
>In article <8617@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> janin@tybalt.caltech.edu (Adam L. Janin) writes:
>>
>>Has anyone used the Programmer's Extender?  I'm interested in increasing
>>application production time, and it seems to be a good choice.  I currently
>>use MPW C and I am considering changing to LightSpeed C.

I haven't used it, yet, so I can't comment.  We just ordered it.
...
>I had Vol. 1&2, but I don't know what the Pro version contains. It
>wasn't around when I bought it.

The Pro version has 100% source included.

>league in my opinion). One problem is that not all of the source is
>provided, so if a bug or design flaw is in one of those procs., you
>have to go back a workaround it somehow. Another problem was there

(see above)

Fred Hollander
Computer Science Center
Texas Instruments, Inc.
holland%ti-csl@csnet-rela

The above statements are my own and not representative of Texas Instruments.