Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!convex!killer!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!iuvax!pur-ee!pur-phy!sho
From: sho@pur-phy (Sho Kuwamoto)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Multiple Button Mouse
Message-ID: <1672@pur-phy>
Date: 23 Nov 88 11:44:41 GMT
References: <1665@pur-phy> <71161@felix.UUCP>
Reply-To: sho@newton.physics.purdue.edu.UUCP (Sho Kuwamoto)
Organization: Purdue Univ. Physics Dept., W. Lafayette, IN
Lines: 15

In article <71161@felix.UUCP> kehr@felix.UUCP (Shirley Kehr) writes:
<In article <1665@pur-phy> sho@newton.physics.purdue.edu.UUCP (Sho Kuwamoto) writes:
<
<<I would go for a two button mouse, although I still think a one button
<<mouse is still easier to use.
<
<I used the 2-button Microsoft mouse with Word on the PC for about a year.
<It really wasn't any more difficult to get used to than Word's key
<commands.

Well, I think the 2 button mouse would be harder for a first time user.
Double clicks are confusing, but the difference between 2 and 1 is in
my opinion, easier to remember than the difference between left and right.

-Sho