Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!killer!texbell!bellcore!clyde!watmath!softart!riml From: riml@softart.UUCP (Research in Motion Limited) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: 16-bit Digital Sound: FP or int? Message-ID: <44@softart.UUCP> Date: 11 Nov 88 15:06:27 GMT Organization: Softart Microsystems Inc., Waterloo Ont. Canada Lines: 35 [Has anyone wondered about sound fidelity at low levels?] Here's a set of questions for inquiring minds. 1) Is the "CD" quality 16-bit output of the NeXT using 16-bit INT words, or 16-bit Floating point words? (i.e. 3-bit exponent+13 bit mantissa) 2) Can anyone tell me the exact specification for the CD/DAT digital format, or can they point me to documentation available at a library, or can they forward this message to the appropriate person or newsgroup? 3) Can anyone tell me if there is a manufacturer of floating point Analogue to Digital converters and Digital to Analogue converters? The reason I ask these questions is simple. I have been convinced that the "CD" digital encoding uses floating point. Why? If it didn't, low level signals would be hopelessly distorted due to the lack of information content in a LINEAR encoding at low levels. Thus, LINEAR 16-bit output D/A systems will NOT produce "CD" quality sound. There has been a lot of hype recently in musical instrument circles about "16-bit" samplers and reproducers giving "CD" quality sound. However, very few manufacturers discuss the encoding scheme. Naturally, based on my assumption above, LINEAR encoding is BAD. If my assumptions are incorrect, I would be happy to be told so by an INFORMED source. I would also be ecstatic since 16-bit FP D-A converters are EXPENSIVE! (I haven't found ONE 16-bit FP A-D converter!) Michael A. Barnstijn, USENET: {uunet|sun|decvax}!watmath!softart!riml VP Software Systems PHONE: (519) 888-7465 Research In Motion Limited SLOMAIL: Suite 6, 465 Phillip St., Waterloo Ontario, Canada N2L 6C7