Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!wald-david
From: wald-david@CS.YALE.EDU (david wald)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: NeXT & "threads"
Message-ID: <43022@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>
Date: 14 Nov 88 19:09:43 GMT
References: <10736@reed.UUCP> <363@thor.wright.EDU> <8760@spl1.UUCP>
Sender: root@yale.UUCP
Reply-To: wald-david@CS.YALE.EDU (david wald)
Organization: Yale University Computer Science Dept, New Haven CT  06520-2158
Lines: 12

In article <8760@spl1.UUCP> bc@halley.UUCP (Bill Crews) writes:
>Threads are not at all new.  Formal treatment of threads in OS theory
>seems to be somewhat newer than the implementations to date, oddly
>enough, n'est ce pas?

Is this odd?  I thought OS theory usually followed practice.


============================================================================
David Wald                                              wald-david@yale.UUCP
						       waldave@yalevm.bitnet
============================================================================