Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!hubcap!gatech!kong!emory!stiatl!meo
From: meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Subject: Re: More on build your own box (LONG)
Keywords: plan ahead
Message-ID: <1724@stiatl.UUCP>
Date: 22 Nov 88 01:06:26 GMT
References: <7648@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal)
Organization: Sales Technologies Inc., Atlanta, GA
Lines: 15

In article <7648@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> heppell@sim.berkeley.edu (Kevin G. Heppell) writes:
(some VERY sensible suggestions)

Obviously, I concur with Kevin.
I don't care whether it's Nu-Bus or not, but it seems as good
a suggestion as any, and a LOT better than the PC buses,
altho the new standard from Compaq et al may be worthwhile.
But since the ONLY reasons I will be on a PC-derivative are
for developing PC software (and I VERY seldom do this!),
or for using existing business products
while I wait for someone to do them in UNIX (or I do them),
I really have no use for anything else to be PC-compatible.
That's what RS-232, Ethernet, and the like are for!

-MileS