Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!ucbvax!husc6!cfa!ward From: ward@cfa.harvard.EDU (Steve Ward) Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k Subject: LONG - 32K Hardware Projects; 32K Software Keywords: LONG, 32K, Software, Hardware Message-ID: <1285@cfa.cfa.harvard.EDU> Date: 23 Nov 88 22:40:55 GMT Organization: Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. for Astrophysics Lines: 75 Here is my sideline appraisal of what is happening in 32K net land with respect to hardware projects: 1. There is one project out there somewhere, coordinated by Richard Rodman. Dave Rand can give pointers to this project. It is an '016 (please correct me if I err) cpu board which plugs into PC I/O bus as a PC I/O card. 2. Several people have designed and wirewrapped 32k boards, but none have been produced as printed circuit boards, except that the item 1. project may be producing or about to produce PCB's. Note that I am excluding commercial activities and only talking about more or less volunteer PD efforts. 3. There seems to be a split into more or less two camps of 32k 'netters with respect to building and buying a 32k board: A. the "small and inexpensive" camp. This camp wants to be able to take adantage of PC hardware (I/O, periphs, chassis) because they either have some or can buy it cheap. For this camp, spending $1k on the 32k hardware alone (not counting PC stuff) represents a hard ceiling; preferably < $500.00 !! B. the "big and costly" or even "medium and moderate cost" camp. This camp wants lots of performance and is willing to pay for it. It is unclear what the price range is, but $2k-$4k seems to be the range, with a few talking even higher prices. Camp A will never convince camp B to switch camps, and vica versa. It seems to be more an issue of money than anything else, and therefore convincing probably means financial grants. I will gladly build a big system if someone out there will bankroll me :-) I personally am going ahead with a *small camp* 32k board project. I encourage others to go ahead with their project, whatever it is. I am of the opinion that forward motion will be slow unless somebody just decides to do something and does it. I don't mean that every project needs a solitary person, but hopefully each project will have somebody that is going to design and build something, heck or high water, and solicits help and input along the way. This is what I am doing. My project is of the small camp variety, but I welcome all comments and help. I think the "big camp" needs somebody to get out in front, and hopefully someone who will commit to the project all the way through to the artwork (gerber plot file for me :-). I guess the make or break point is when you find out if you have enough people and money to make some boards, but you really are not at that point until you have the artwork in hand, ready for PCB fab. If you can't get that far, you can only talk in hypothetical terms about who may be willing to pay for a board. Sure, you have to discuss what is most likely to be acceptable to most people, but then you have to go do it. A "big camp" point man is needed. BTW, the main reason I am going ahead with a small 32k board project is because I want one, no matter what happens elsewhere, and the only way to guarantee getting a board at least moderately conforming to what I want is to build it myself. I have no illusions about building the board the 32k 'netters will desire - interest on the part of others is nice, but secondary. Still, I am trying to work with others on this just because more progress can be made and faster, with additional help. Clearly my 32k board will only appeal, at most, to the "small camp." There is a clear common ground for these two camps: 32K SOFTWARE! In response to earlier postings, several people have volunteered to maintain 32K software archives at their sites. Others have volunteered software. Shortly there will be a posting announcing the details, including how/where to retrieve the software and to contribute it. Hopefully software is a true common ground and everyone will support the sharing concept! Regards to all Steve W. cfa@harvard.edu ...harvard!cfa!ward