Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uwmcsd1!marque!uunet!mcvax!ukc!reading!bru-cc!linda From: linda@cc.brunel.ac.uk (Linda Birmingham) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: Reasons for restricting su privilege? Keywords: su, restricted-su Message-ID: <479@Terra.cc.brunel.ac.uk> Date: 8 Nov 88 15:07:16 GMT References: <6606@pyr.gatech.EDU> <3948@encore.UUCP> Reply-To: linda@cc.brunel.ac.uk (Linda Birmingham) Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK Lines: 38 In article <3948@encore.UUCP> bzs@xenna (Barry Shein) writes: > >> I'm having a problem convincing some of the people around >> here of the dangers of having several super users. One of >> our faculty members insists upon having the privilege, >> for whenever one of the normal super users isn't around. I've >> tried every argument I know, all to no avail. Any hints? >> Any new arguments? For that matter, give me the old arguments. > Try getting hold of the super-user shell which was on the net early this year. sush is a restricted shell that allows systems administrators to grant specific limited privileges to users. All commands that are executed are logged to the system log, as well as other pertinent information. I feel strongly that the number of super-users should be limited. It's hard to trace any "funnys" on the system when a number of people have had their fingers in the pie. We all have bad days. We all make mistakes. the more super-users you have the more inconsistencies you are going to get. The more super-users you have the greater the possibility of a terminal being accidentally left in root mode, and the greater the possibility of the password being observed. However, if you are strict about the number of super-users you should always make sure one of them IS available or at least can be contacted if possible. >"lab" happy. Too bad, yer dead meat. On the other hand one has to be >somewhat sensitive to feelings of being treated like a child or an >idiot, throwing in the accountability with the privileges should >accomplish that, after all, that's all you're really trying to get >across (right?!) Providing you can prove WHO screwed up the system !! Linda. -- Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, England. janet: linda@uk.ac.brunel.cc | :-) uucp:...ukc!cc.brunel!linda |