Xref: utzoo news.admin:3998 news.groups:6206 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!cmcl2!phri!roy From: roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups Subject: Re: New BIONET Groups Message-ID: <3600@phri.UUCP> Date: 15 Nov 88 15:04:20 GMT References: Reply-To: roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Organization: Public Health Research Inst. (NY, NY) Lines: 17 lear@NET.BIO.NET (Eliot Lear) writes: > Please be aware that [bionet.{technology.conversion,molbio.ageing}] will > be created over the weekend, and that they are legitimate. Why bother? From what I can see, all the bionet groups combined get perhaps one or two articles a week. Hardly enough to justify a single newsgroup, and certainly not enough for the 20 or so groups that already exist. Perhaps something is wrong with my feed (rutgers) and I just don't get most of the stuff? Also, according to my copy of Webster's, it should be "aging", not "ageing". -- Roy Smith, System Administrator Public Health Research Institute {allegra,philabs,cmcl2,rutgers}!phri!roy -or- phri!roy@uunet.uu.net "The connector is the network"