Xref: utzoo soc.culture.jewish:8193 news.misc:1981 soc.culture.african:486
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ames!pasteur!agate!rob@violet.berkeley.edu
From: rob@violet.berkeley.edu (Rev. Bob)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish,news.misc,soc.culture.african
Subject: Re: RACIST JOKES
Keywords: JEDR, racist, jokes
Message-ID: <17319@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 21 Nov 88 19:39:12 GMT
References: <8030@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <1058@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> <1060@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> <1057@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> <1223@fig.bbn.com> <666@fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov> <8052@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <7576@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <8086@bloom-beacon.MIT.E
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: Moral and in the Majority, Inc.
Lines: 23

In article <8086@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> richmond@athena.mit.edu (Jonathan E. D. Richmond) writes:
>My overall preference would be for Mr. Templeton to show some moderation,
>then I could forget about the whole matter.  I certainly agree that
>good judgement with free will is the best way to go.

Well, you might be able to forget about it.  Mr Templeton (If he knows
what's good for him) had better preapprove those jokes with ME, so I
can tell him which jokes, would offend MY brand of Christianity.

My people don't approve of any postings relating to SEX, DRUGS, ROCK 
MUSIC, JUDAISM, ISLAM, CATHOLISM, DEVIL worship or other satanistic
practices.  This stuff is just morally offensive, and as Nancy Gould
said (a bit of a paraphrase here), "If it offends someone why post at
all?"  

A member of our group is preparing a MORALITY TEST for all the USENET
moderators (and potential moderators) to take to see if they are fit
for the job. 

Mr Richmond is right.  The moderators need some guidance and my group is
here to help.

Rev. Bob