Xref: utzoo news.misc:2003 soc.culture.jewish:8229
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!ames!amelia!eos!labrea!decwrl!eda!jim
From: jim@eda.com (Jim Budler)
Newsgroups: news.misc,soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: RACIST JOKES
Message-ID: <370@eda.com>
Date: 22 Nov 88 07:21:13 GMT
References: <8030@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <1058@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> <1060@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> <1057@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.ed <347@sulaco.UUCP> <1082@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu>
Reply-To: jim@eda.com (Jim Budler)
Distribution: na
Organization: EDA Systems,Inc. Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 35

In article <1082@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> nmg@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu.UUCP (Nancy M Gould) writes:
| 
| I think that it is OK for JEDR to do anything that is in accordance
| with U.S. Law.  If Brad's legal rights (i.e., freedom of speech, etc.)
| are being threatened, the courts will decide.
| 

Oh, F***, now Brad's gotta spend real money going to court.

And why in accordance to U.S. Law? I see you weren't paying
attention. Brad posts from Waterloo, Ontario, *Canada*.

Step back a moment, and think. If this ends up in a court, the
probable result is the end of news.

One of the things the rest of the world finds disgusting
about the U.S. is the habit its citizens have of suing.

Possible European Joke:

How many U.S. Courts does it take to screw in a light bulb?

6:
1 to sue the manufacturer of the bulb being replaced.
1 to sue the power company whose electricity destroyed the bulb.
1 superior court to review the lower decisions.
1 appelate court to review the lower decisions.
1 state supreme court to review the lower decisions.
1 U.S. Supreme Court to review the lower decisions.

-- 
Jim Budler   address = uucp: ...!{decwrl,uunet}!eda!jim OR domain: jim@eda.com
#define disclaimer	"I do not speak for my employer"
#define truth       "I speak for myself"
#define result      "variable"