Xref: utzoo news.misc:2016 rec.humor.d:1151 news.groups:6306
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!peregrine!elroy!ames!ncar!woods
From: woods@ncar.ucar.edu (Greg Woods)
Newsgroups: news.misc,rec.humor.d,news.groups
Subject: moderator recall (was Re: RACIST JOKES)
Message-ID: <1029@ncar.ucar.edu>
Date: 22 Nov 88 23:40:23 GMT
References: <8030@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU. <1058@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu. <666@fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov. <687@optilink.UUCP> <Nov.22.17.14.08.1988.4564@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: woods@handies.UCAR.EDU (Greg Woods)
Organization: Scientific Computing Division/NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 16

In article <Nov.22.17.14.08.1988.4564@topaz.rutgers.edu> msmith@topaz.rutgers.edu (Mark Robert Smith) writes:
>There is a discussion starting in rec.humor.d,news.groups, and
>soc.culture.jewish about the possible recall of Brad as moderator of
>rec.humor.funny.

  I think you guys are all targeting the wrong area here. If you really don't
want to see this kind of thing on the net, try flaming the people who sent
the jokes in to Brad in the first place. If rec.humor.funny goes away (or has
its charter changed, or whatever) these same people will still be posting
the material you find objectionable in rec.humor, which is not moderated.
And they might not even bother to rotate it.  It's called attacking the 
problem at its source, not at the easiest-to-reach place.
  Note that this argument is independent of whether or not I personally
object to the material in question.

--Greg