Xref: utzoo alt.flame:3175 news.misc:2020 rec.humor.d:1152 soc.culture.jewish:8263 Path: utzoo!hoptoad!pacbell!ames!nrl-cmf!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!emory!stiatl!meo From: meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) Newsgroups: alt.flame,news.misc,rec.humor.d,soc.culture.jewish Subject: Re: The Good, the Bad, and the Stupid (LONG) Message-ID: <1777@stiatl.UUCP> Date: 22 Nov 88 23:48:14 GMT References: Reply-To: meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) Distribution: usa Organization: X and Absurdity Lines: 33 In article clong@topaz.rutgers.edu (Chris Long) writes: >Gee, even some atheists! I thought we were all Satanists. No, you guys are just heathens. Now us Christian rockers, we are supposed to be Satanists... >"The white, christian, male support that Brad gets makes >him feel justified. The if you don't like it, leave it attitude >(Don't subscribe if you are offended) does not address the issue." I stayed out of it at first, just so this kind of argument would not get used (it WAS soc.culture.jewish), but now that they know our secret, we are OUT of the closet. Actually, while most of the support I read for Brad was male (based on my gender-guess at account names*), a substantial amount was ... Jewish (AIEEEE!!!!), and predominantly NON-Christian. So Nancy slipped up there. There were a NUMBER of avowed aetheists/agnostics/etc (watch those etc - they REALLY proselytize...) supporting Brad. Perhaps Nancy meant to say,oh... "caucasian, non-Jewish, male", since I am sure she would never assume goy == Christian. And of course, while we may asSUME the posters are caucasian, there is no evidence of that over the net, except for what our preconceptions tell us, are there (except when we KNOW the poster, of course)? Chris - an excellent response on your part. MileS *Even there, more than guesswork, I went by claims as to genderness made by many of them in soc.men & soc.women. I had to assume they were telling the truth...