Xref: utzoo alt.flame:3188 news.misc:2045 Path: utzoo!hoptoad!cpsc6a!atl2!akgua!att!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu!nmg From: nmg@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu (Nancy M Gould) Newsgroups: alt.flame,news.misc Subject: Re: The Good, the Bad, and the Stupid (LONG) Message-ID: <1094@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> Date: 23 Nov 88 19:49:57 GMT References: <1777@stiatl.UUCP> Reply-To: nmg@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu.UUCP (Nancy M Gould) Distribution: usa Organization: Mathematical Sciences Computer Lab, Columbus, OH Lines: 51 In article <1777@stiatl.UUCP> meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) writes: >In article clong@topaz.rutgers.edu (Chris Long) writes: > >>"The white, christian, male support that Brad gets makes >>him feel justified. The if you don't like it, leave it attitude >>(Don't subscribe if you are offended) does not address the issue." > >I stayed out of it at first, just so this kind of argument >would not get used (it WAS soc.culture.jewish), but now that they >know our secret, we are OUT of the closet. Actually, while most >of the support I read for Brad was male (based on my gender-guess at >account names*), a substantial amount was ... Jewish (AIEEEE!!!!), >and predominantly NON-Christian. So Nancy slipped up there. There >were a NUMBER of avowed aetheists/agnostics/etc (watch those etc - >they REALLY proselytize...) supporting Brad. Perhaps Nancy meant >to say,oh... "caucasian, non-Jewish, male", since I am sure she >would never assume goy == Christian. The above quote that you are referring to was not by me (I believe it was by Betsy Schwartz). If you are going to be so opinionated on an issue, please, please, PLEASE read the postings more carefully. And make sure that when you respond to an article, you respond to the right person next time. Thank you. -- "When the writer becomes the center of his attention, he becomes a nudnik. And a nudnik who believes he's profound is even worse than just a plain nudnik." --Isaac Bashevis Singer (1904- ) Nancy M. Gould