Xref: utzoo news.groups:6215 news.sysadmin:1502
Path: utzoo!utgpu!bnr-vpa!bnr-fos!bnr-di!borynec
From: borynec@bnr-di.UUCP (James Borynec)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.sysadmin
Subject: Re: Proposal for comp.security/alt.security
Message-ID: <143@bnr-di.UUCP>
Date: 16 Nov 88 21:05:31 GMT
References: <2347@isis.UUCP> <22460@tis.llnl.gov> <1147@unisec.usi.com> <356@cvbnet2.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: DI, Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Ont.
Lines: 15

In article <356@cvbnet2.UUCP>, pcolby@robbie.prime.com (Peter Colby) writes:
> In article <33589@zardoz.UUCP> neil@zardoz.UUCP (Neil Gorsuch) writes:
> > [much explanation regarding the social & professional qualifications
> >  needed for inclusion on either the "zardoz" or the "isis" security lists]
> >
> Once again, some of us poor SA's are being discriminated against. 

I am in the same boat as Peter.  I (perhaps not suprisingly) also agree
with Peter.  We have to get security information out to ALL system 
administrators.  This effectively requires a PUBLIC security list/group.
It may be a bitter pill, but I see no other workable option.

James Borynec  utgpu!bnr-vpa!bnr-di!borynec

ps. This whole argument reminds me of the 'criminals have guns' debate