Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!tank!nic.MR.NET!shamash!nis!com50!pai!erc From: erc@pai.UUCP (Eric Johnson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Finder proposal: CLI's (long) Summary: HyperCard has a Command Line Message Box Message-ID: <296@pai.UUCP> Date: 28 Nov 88 15:11:59 GMT References: <928@dogie.edu> <1679@pur-phy> Distribution: na Organization: Prime Automation, Inc., Burnsville, MN Lines: 84 In article <1679@pur-phy>, sho@pur-phy (Sho Kuwamoto) writes: > In article <928@dogie.edu> terranova@vms.macc.wisc.edu (John Terranova) writes > , mikem@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Mike Morton) writes... > < > < << > < > < > > None, at least from this end. I agree, to some extent. An obvious > starting point would be the MPW shell. Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't HyperCard have a command-line message box? This seems to me to be a more natural starting point. The box is smaller (1 line), acts as a window on the Mac desktop and would seem to fit more in line with the Mac way of doing things. A natural extension of HyperCard would be to eventually make the Finder a part of HyperCard, i.e., a user-configurable interface. Look at all the Finder "shells" that people write in HyperCard. I'm sure Apple has also looked at them. People want a method of configuring the Mac interface, e.g., adding help screens, linking options, etc. I have a feeling that in three years, the Finder will be a HyperCard stack. Anyone at Apple care to confirm or deny? > This sounds like just nitpicking, but let me put the situation this > way. I would greatly appreciate having a command line interface to > the Finder. So would I. The Mac Finder style of interface is great for pointing, clicking, et. al., but it breaks down in selecting. In the Finder, I can select a rectangular area of icons, one icon or all the icons in a window. The system breaks down, though, if I want to select all the .c files, for example. Unless I spend a good deal of time arranging all the .c files (as opposed to the .h, .txt, etc. files) into rectangles, I have trouble copying some items to back them up. Unfortunately, this is one area where MS-DOS beats the Mac (COPY *.C TARGET), as does Unix (cp *.c target). On the Mac, it is hard to select all the .c files in one swoop. Thus, there is a good use for a command line interpreter. On the other hand, I do NOT prefer MS-DOS to the Mac Finder interface. I just want some of the good features of a CLI interface to go along with the great features on the Mac. Note that the Amiga appears to use a windowing system (I think they call it Intuition) and have CLI windows on the Amiga "desktop". (No flames please, I own a Mac, NOT an Amiga and I don't want to get into a religious conflict. I see nothing wrong in recognizing good features of other machines.) > Maybe stick the CLI in a floating palette, like the > message box in Hypercard. I agree. Or maybe put it in a normal window, a window that follows all the Mac standards. > I'm a big believer in CLI's. In a lot of situations, it's easier to > use for the experienced user than a visual interface. > -Sho Just my $0.02 -Eric -- Eric F. Johnson | Phone +1 612-894-0313 | Are we Prime Automation,Inc | UUCP: bungia!pai!erc | having 12201 Wood Lake Drive | UUCP: sun!tundra!pai!erc | fun Burnsville, MN 55337 USA | DOMAIN: erc@pai.mn.org | yet?