Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rutgers!ucsd!nprdc!bickel From: bickel@nprdc.arpa (Steven Bickel) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Thought/Emotion/Feeling Message-ID: <1160@arctic.nprdc.arpa> Date: 12 Dec 88 20:11:58 GMT References: <569@epicb.UUCP> <1146@arctic.nprdc.arpa> <1152@arctic.nprdc.arpa> <496@uceng.UC.EDU> <1154@arctic.nprdc.arpa> <1867@cadre.dsl.PITTSBURGH.EDU> Sender: news@nprdc.arpa Reply-To: bickel@nprdc.arpa (Steven Bickel) Organization: Navy Personnel R&D Center, San Diego Lines: 29 In article <1867@cadre.dsl.PITTSBURGH.EDU> geb@cadre.dsl.pittsburgh.edu (Gordon E. Banks) writes: >In article <1154@arctic.nprdc.arpa> bickel@nprdc.arpa (Steven Bickel) writes: >> Good Reading :-) >> >> J. Jaynes, The origin of consciousness and the breakdown of the >> bicameral mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976. >> > >Now I know where that idea about language and consciousness >evolving in the last 10000 years came from! Jaynes' thesis is >considered quack by every anthropologist I have talked to. >It is highly interesting, but also highly unlikely. Not quite >as bad as Velikovsky, but getting there. Actually, Jaynes seemed >to base his theories more on literary evidence from ancient writings >such as the Iliad. I didn't find his arguments convincing. In the four references I listed there are large disagreements in many specific areas. I do not entirely agree with Jaynes thesis, but, his concept of the "bicameral mind being a product of language" seems reasonable. Wilbur seems to have a much better grasp of how the pieces fit together, but, I do not agree with his concept of a Superconsciousness as the ultimate developmental growth stage. The overall concepts portrayed by all of them collectively fit the evolutionary concept of rapid periods of adaptation/growth followed by plateau periods. I believe that this "general theory" is widely accepted by the anthropological community - It has been widely publicized lately and I am not aware of any criticisms. Steve Bickel