Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.lans:2096 comp.sys.ibm.pc:22086
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!peregrine!ccicpg!cci632!ritcsh!ultb!glz5913
From: glz5913@ultb.UUCP (G.L. Zeiger )
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: PC clones and IBM Token Ring cards
Message-ID: <247@ultb.UUCP>
Date: 8 Dec 88 17:53:58 GMT
References: <37@cs.columbia.edu> <1331@mtunb.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: glz5913@ultb.UUCP (G.L. Zeiger (713ICS))
Distribution: na
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology (Info Systems)
Lines: 16

In article <1331@mtunb.ATT.COM> dmt@mtunb.UUCP (Dave Tutelman) writes:
>In article <37@cs.columbia.edu> chris@cs.columbia.edu (Chris Maio) writes:
>>Does anyone out there know the details of compatibility problems between AT
>>clones and IBM's PC/AT token ring cards?  I've heard that this card doesn't

I know that they work in Compaq's, Zenith, and also in a "no-name" clone
that we had (We got rid of it for other reasons).  I'd think if you set
the switches on the card to reflect the proper interrupt vectors that
you should be ok (granted, this doesn't cover every SINGLE clone!).


-- 
Gary L. Zeiger            USENET:  ~rochester!kodak!pcid!gizzmo!lazlo!sysz!gary
                          BITNET:  GLZ5913@RITVAX
WANTED:  a *REAL* woman
Teases, flirts, users, and cheaters need not apply.