Xref: utzoo comp.edu:1650 sci.math:5221 sci.physics:5290 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!ucsd!rutgers!att!ihlpb!nevin1 From: nevin1@ihlpb.ATT.COM (Liber) Newsgroups: comp.edu,sci.math,sci.physics Subject: Re: Student and Course Integrity Message-ID: <9237@ihlpb.ATT.COM> Date: 21 Dec 88 02:20:45 GMT References: <4550@homxc.UUCP> <4847@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <2082@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU> Reply-To: nevin1@ihlpb.UUCP (55528-Liber,N.J.) Followup-To: comp.edu Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 31 [followups to comp.edu] In article <2082@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU> mccombt@turing.cs.rpi.edu (Todd McComb) writes: >I agree. Most introductory level courses (most anything taught at an >undergraduate level) work well in classroom settings. I disagree! If this were true, there wouldn't be so many problems in the advanced level courses. It is much more important the fundamentals to be taught well. But look who teaches the intro courses at the majority of American universities: teaching assistants. What are their *teaching* qualifications? None. You do not need an education in education to be considered qualified to practice education at the college level (ironic, isn't it?). I cannot think of any other profession where this is true. Why does this happen? Although it is more important for professors to be teaching the fundamentals, they are the only ones who know enough to teach the advanced courses. So what happens? Students don't get a good base on which to build, and they really have to struggle all of their college life. Will this change? Probably not; universities are not all that interested in educating Joe Student. Unfortunately, benchmarks, (er, uh, I mean grades) don't reflect these problems in the introductory courses; it is much easier to get a B in a 100-level course if you don't really know what you are doing than it is in a 300-level course. If you are getting an A or a B, you tend to think that you 'know' the material. It's only later, when it is far too late to catch up, that your understanding is actually tested. -- NEVIN ":-)" LIBER AT&T Bell Laboratories nevin1@ihlpb.ATT.COM (312) 979-4751