Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!steve
From: steve@oakhill.UUCP (steve)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Dubious Fortran Construct
Summary: Email results to me, I'll post.
Message-ID: <1746@devsys.oakhill.UUCP>
Date: 16 Dec 88 20:20:43 GMT
References: <22994@sgi.SGI.COM> <11800009@modcomp>
Organization: Motorola Inc. Austin, Tx
Lines: 33

<1136@ncar.ucar.edu> <828@wilbur.unix.ETA.COM>
Reply-To: steve@devsys.UUCP ()
Organization: Motorola Inc., Austin Tx.
Keywords: branching doloops

I requested with the original posting of the code, that people Email me the
results, and I'll post them.  Since I am still recieveing mail, I am
holding off posting for now.  Do not worry if you think your mail will
duplicate some result already sent, Please send it anyway (I only just got
a SUN result today). 

In article <828@wilbur.unix.ETA.COM>
                   phinker@eta.unix.ETA.COM (Paul Hinker) writes:
>
>  How do PC-Fortrans handle this little beauty?  Could someone post the 
>results.
>
I have not recieved any PC results yet. (hint, hint)

Please Email what you think this code should generate too (and why).

Also please do not send me any flames on how horrible the code is.  It
was ment to be ugly, ambigous, and a rough test.

                   enough from this mooncalf - Steven
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
These opinions aren't necessarily Motorola's or Remora's - but I'd like to
think we share some common views.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven R Weintraub                        cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!devsys!steve
Motorola Inc.  Austin, Texas 
(512) 440-3023 (office) (512) 453-6953 (home)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------