Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!husc6!purdue!decwrl!vixie From: vixie@decwrl.dec.com (Paul A Vixie) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: Another example why not to re-route Message-ID: Date: 14 Dec 88 14:57:01 GMT References: <321@aber-cs.UUCP> <370@lakart.UUCP> <174@jetson.UPMA.MD.US> Sender: vixie@decwrl.dec.com Organization: DEC Western Research Lab Lines: 32 In-reply-to: john@jetson.UPMA.MD.US's message of 13 Dec 88 14:51:38 GMT [Owens] # As a practical example, I've received a couple of failed mail messages # intended for a site named "jetson" in West Germany. The failure # message was sent from (if I remember correctly) # ifistg!MAILER-DAEMON # to # unido!somewhere!jetson!user # Someone, perhaps unido, did "peeking" and sent it to the jetson in the # maps (me), causing two transatlantic crossings (one for the original # failure message and one for my failure message back to the # MAILER-DAEMON). Unido's policy is to reroute based on the facts that (a) they have to pay lots of money for the transatlanctic crossings -- and in fact they charge this back to other German sites, and (b) the German namespace is totally controlled and there can be no duplicate host names. Though why they reroute things bound for non-German sites and send them to other non-German sites, I cannot fathom. was trying to send mail to for a while, but since unido insisted on sending it to and because was down and was brain dead, we finally solved it by changing to and creating . I have a message for those of you who think you know a better route. But I cannot repeat it in polite company. If the postmaster of unido would like to speak to me in person, I will be in Germany from 16-December to 5-January; send mail to to arrange an appointment. -- Paul Vixie Work: vixie@decwrl.dec.com decwrl!vixie +1 415 853 6600 Play: paul@vixie.sf.ca.us vixie!paul +1 415 864 7013