Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!proxftl!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.uucp (T. William Wells)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Some questions about pathalias and smail
Message-ID: <248@twwells.uucp>
Date: 14 Dec 88 23:44:30 GMT
References: <236@twwells.uucp> <820@mailrus.cc.umich.edu> <4957@bsu-cs.UUCP> <158@orac.pgh.pa.us>
Reply-To: bill@twwells.UUCP (T. William Wells)
Followup-To: mail
Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale
Lines: 19

In article <158@orac.pgh.pa.us> pat@orac.pgh.pa.us (Pat Barron) writes:
: As to your point about how to avoid routing through the Internet now that
: UUCP sites are getting real domain names ... Repeat after me:  "Names are
: not routes.  Routes are not names."

Repeat after me: "UUCP doesn't know about names, only routes...."

---

After considering what I've received, I've decided that I'm going to
let the maps have their way. My reasoning? If the sites didn't want
to be routed through, they should have made sure that their map entry
reflected this. If they didn't? Not my problem, I'm not their mommy.

Anyone have a good reason for not doing this? If so, USE E-MAIL to
tell me.

---
Bill
{uunet|novavax}!proxftl!twwells!bill