Xref: utzoo alt.bbs:309 comp.misc:4376 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!labrea!rutgers!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!sunybcs!boulder!tramp!hassell From: hassell@tramp.Colorado.EDU (Christopher Hassell) Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.misc Subject: Re: New Ideas in BBSes (No BS!) Keywords: BBS Client Server Network NOMSDOS Message-ID: <5282@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Date: 13 Dec 88 06:23:42 GMT References: <1217@cps3xx.UUCP> <2093@uokmax.UUCP> <2324@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <437@telly.UUCP> <1089@tank.uchicago.edu> <243@taniwha.UUCP> <11373@reed.UUCP> <2070@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU> Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU Reply-To: hassell@tramp.Colorado.EDU (Christopher Hassell) Distribution: na Organization: (Let's see, I'm positive .. I've got ... ) Lines: 25 In article <2070@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU> fargo@pawl17.pawl.rpi.edu (Ethan M. Young) writes: >As to the subject of supporting glass TTY's and ASCII terminals: > >Instead of being stuck supporting ONLY ASCII dumb terminals, nor instead of >relying heavily on specialized protocols, a good BBS should allow the user to >choose which system he/she wants depending on the user's terminal set-up. If ^^^^^^ >"Which terminal emulator can you support? (C)ourier (V)T-100 (A)NSI etc." > >Thank you and happy hunting! Internet: fargo@pawl.rpi.edu ____ [> SB <] fargo@{paraguay|uruguay}.acm.rpi.edo > /__ -=>??<=- Bitnet (??): usergac0@rpitsmts.bitnet > / ARGO : 3000 years of regression from the year 4990 One last time, No one out there Dare to allow ONLY non-graphic client-progs under pain of being foolish :-b. The idea should be, as was said, to have a lowest-default or simple recognition system for the DUMB among us (terminals that are) and the smart too, of course. a concerned vt100, (ttyia)@tramp.Colorado.EDU Disclaimer: The current user has no responsibility for the text in this article. He's off eating right now probably. (geezmyspacebaraches). (gets crumbs between keys too, the dope)