Xref: utzoo comp.misc:4419 comp.os.minix:4334 comp.unix.xenix:4197 comp.unix.microport:2308 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!ulysses!andante!alice!debra From: debra@alice.UUCP (Paul De Bra) Newsgroups: comp.misc,comp.os.minix,comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport Subject: Re: Questions from the Soviets about UNIX Message-ID: <8550@alice.UUCP> Date: 16 Dec 88 19:42:19 GMT References: <10031@well.UUCP> Reply-To: debra@alice.UUCP () Organization: AT&T, Bell Labs Lines: 57 In article <10031@well.UUCP> crunch@well.UUCP (John Draper) writes: > > > I have a Soviet frind named Dima who has prepared a list of questions >that I'm sure almost anyone might be able to answer. This is the first >list of questions from the Soviet Union that I am passing on for anyone >to answer. >... >Here are Dima's questions: > >1.So we need information about any software which makes it possible to >create UNIXlike networks under MSDOS. The "MKS" toolkit provides most Unix commands for use with MS-DOG. PC-NFS allows MS-DOS machines to share files with Unix-systems that support NFS using Ethernet. >2.We've just arranged Xenix ver.2.0 for PC AT.What can we do to try >Telecommunications on it? Read the information on uucp in the manuals (assuming you got them). >3.How is it possible to install 4 modems in one computer?Using Com 1,2,3,4? >What multiplex board do we need(specification)? Get SCO Xenix 2.3 if you want to use com 1-4. It won't work on old versions. But SCO provides a list of multiplex boards that do work (using only one com-interrupt) in there release notes and in their "directory". >4. Please send us a technical documentation for FidoNet and UUCP with >possibilities of this software and hardware support. Prices? Don't know about FidoNet, but all necessary info on UUCP should be in the manuals. But it's all in English of course :-) >We can use IBM PC/AT/XT, so have you any examples of usage this computers >for such net which you describe in last message? SCO Xenix provides a simple mail network between Xenix systems. It is called "micnet". Communicating with the USSR (and other communist countries) may be somewhat difficult because of the danger of "sensitive" information being send to countries that are not supposed to have access to that information. As far as I know Usenet does not officially have a status of a mail carrier like the post office. If you send a letter with classified information to the USSR the post office cannot be held responsible, but if you post a message in a Usenet newsgroup that is broadcast to the USSR (assuming we would get Usenet news readers in the USSR) it is feasible that Usenet can be held responsible. Paul. -- ------------------------------------------------------ |debra@research.att.com | uunet!research!debra | ------------------------------------------------------