Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!boulder!tramp!hintz
From: hintz@tramp.Colorado.EDU (HINTZ  THOMAS ANDREW)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: v16i090:  Smithsonian Astronomical Observatory, Part01/49
Message-ID: <5304@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 14 Dec 88 02:12:52 GMT
References: <1527@ucsfcca.ucsf.edu> <611@cimcor.mn.org> <6284@fluke.COM> <12568@cup.portal.com>
Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Reply-To: hintz@tramp.Colorado.EDU (HINTZ  THOMAS ANDREW)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 28

In article <12568@cup.portal.com> thad@cup.portal.com (Thad P Floryan) writes:
>Re: all the fuss and controversy surrounding the posting of something
>genuinely useful (the SAO database) ...
>
>WHY aren't there any "gripes" when mega multi-part game sources are posted
>to the net?
>
>Seems to me that some people's priorities are in need of frobozzed and
>bifurcated attitude adjustments!   :-)      (and xyzzy to you, too)
>
>Hey, lighten up.  At least people aren't posting X-rated pictures to the net.
>
>
>Thad Floryan [thad@cup.portal.com (OR) ..!sun!portal!cup.portal.com!thad]


I think that extensive database are a good idea. I have not yet 
recived all the pieces to this one yet, but I am anxious for 
the remaining few so I can see just what this one does!

I wouldn't gripe about anything being sent through the net 
(even X-rated pictures!). I have recieved many usefull and helpfull
items. As a matter of fact, the only thing that gets up me
(esp. in source news groups) is extensive arguing. So, before
I get annoyed at myself, I will be off.

					Tom Hintz
					hintz@tramp.colorado.edu
					ncar!boulder!tramp!hintz