Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!ukma!gatech!bbn!bbn.com!rsalz From: rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: SAO Part01/49 Message-ID: <1305@fig.bbn.com> Date: 14 Dec 88 23:50:23 GMT References: <1249@fig.bbn.com> <1280@vsi1.UUCP> <151@cjsa.WA.COM> <7298@watcgl.waterloo.edu> <5148@bsu-cs.UUCP> Organization: BBN Systems and Technologies Corporation Lines: 31 In <5148@bsu-cs.UUCP> dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes: >In article <7298@watcgl.waterloo.edu> awpaeth@watcgl.waterloo.edu (Alan Wm >Paeth) writes: >[explanation of why this big posting appeared on comp.sources.unix] > >I think if this explanation had been given in part 0 of the posting, >there would have been fewer flames. People are fairly reasonable if >you explain why something is being done. Bottom line: It was posted because I thought it would be of enough value. Believe me, I know the propogation and cost of distribution what I approve -- all it takes is one failed gateway and I get gazillions of copies of everything... :-) Alan's article made the SAO posting sound like a well-reasoned experiment, with definite criteria to determine future behavior. Nahh, it was just a whim. As I recall I said somethink like "Well, it's a little large, let's see what happens." I think I'm gonna be a little more gun-shy about large postings. Only problem is that I've already committed to a 60-parter... The discussion here (and in my mailbox) has been very light. In fact, the distribution has 49 parts, and I've seen less than 49 articles about it -- and that almost counts the private email I've gotten. Surely this is some kind of record for Usenet. Netters who I've come in contact for comp.sources.unix have been almost 100% reasonable. Certainly much more than I should expect, given the the abuses that have gone on. But one request: if you'd like to know my opinion on something, please ask me directly -- I tend to get turned off by postings of the form "I feel that blah blah blah. Rich?" -- Please send comp.sources.unix-related mail to rsalz@uunet.uu.net.