Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!super!udel!gatech!uflorida!ukma!nrl-cmf!ames!pasteur!agate!light.ssl.berkeley.edu!johnf
From: johnf@light.ssl.berkeley.edu (John Flanagan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: ComputerWorld tidbit
Message-ID: <18255@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 14 Dec 88 00:55:40 GMT
References: <636@cord.UUCP> <14302@cisunx.UUCP> <54@microsoft.UUCP> <12571@cup.portal.com>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: na
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 21

In article <12571@cup.portal.com> thad@cup.portal.com (Thad P Floryan) writes:
>Re: Multi-tasking won't work in less than 1MByte re: Gates' garbage ...
>
>Hmmm, then was I dreaming when my Amigas operated (in 1985) with 256K RAM
>before I installed the extra 256K (for 512KBytes, total) in the nosepieces of
>the A1000s?
>
>And the AT&T UNIXPC (aka 3B1 aka 7300) seems to function just fine, even
>the small ones, running UNIX SVR2+ with just 512KByte RAM on the motherboard.

Not to mention the PDP-11 which ran unix in, what, 64K?

>Has Gates been smoking some gunga butts or sumtin'?   :-)  :-)

Gotta wonder :-)

>Thad Floryan [thad@cup.portal.com (OR) ..!sun!portal!cup.portal.com!thad]

--John Flanagan
  johnf@sag4.ssl.berkeley.edu