Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!uhnix1!sugar!karl
From: karl@sugar.uu.net (Karl Lehenbauer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Software Development And Piracy (Spurred By FTL replies)
Message-ID: <3125@sugar.uu.net>
Date: 20 Dec 88 13:55:00 GMT
References: <416@orbit.UUCP>
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston, TX
Lines: 14

In article <416@orbit.UUCP>, swordfis@pnet51.cts.com (Tim Mitchell) writes:
> The defect just kept resetting my Amiga instead of loading -- "Chunk, click,
> click, reset. Chunk, click, click, reset." Tell me that's* not because of
> an error in the protection scheme. 

OK, that's not because of an error in the protection scheme.  :-)

Seriously though, it isn't necessarily.  If the copy was defective and the
right part of the disk was trashed, any boot disk could do this.  It is
not ipso facto proof the copy protection is responsible.
-- 
-- "We've been following your progress with considerable interest, not to say
-- contempt."  -- Zaphod Beeblebrox IV
-- uunet!sugar!karl, Unix BBS (713) 438-5018